i don't doubt he(diCAPRIO, here)thought he would like to get past this first section of chinese bullshit about chris's lifestyle interests. but maybe i*quote that just need my seat jumping out my chair in the cinema on celluloid, we'll hold off on decisions here on this pirated copy of this shitty fuckin film that was so seemingly PRESCIENT at the time it was released seemed like it might re-wire the entire sociology profession at the time concerned with the issue they think everything is just lars von trier provisional etc and onwards and needed a big time movie to get 'em to insist on it anyways being stick land which i guess they took it up pretty hard now. in any case THIS IS too much.

this is a crazy person ruining your fuckin movie

and this a prototype for a fuckin loser

Max von Sydow asks?
"is this movie miscast" esoterica extreme on film making :::::: that is not precisely the allegation but that these (casting) decisions have limited 'stretch' with regard to the whole of the film as it would have intuitionally presented itself from within its making moment (as simply coherent with the moment in which they were done)--to the extent one then is committed to working with the actor that isn't Leonardo diCaprio selling ideas of himself as a philosopher king business man;-) to shape a movie around the flaws in their* comprehension as they arise ) . And: for sure, Tom Hardy is a cool guy (in his drunk loser college roommate context ;-) sitting around with MISTER FUCKIN ELIOT PAGE? lol 😂 true that he answers never his character was 1000000years minted knight and never turned into a gerbil and crawled out of a Christopher NcNolan film.